Journal of Integrative Health Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2026 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Limitations and Pitfalls of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: A Narrative Review

Vaibhavi Bhimda, Ajay K Kubavat, Khyati V Patel, Shobhit Saxena, Keyur U Parmar

Keywords : Artificial intelligence, Cephalometric analysis, Deep learning, Limitations, Machine learning, Narrative review, Orthodontics

Citation Information : Bhimda V, Kubavat AK, Patel KV, Saxena S, Parmar KU. Limitations and Pitfalls of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: A Narrative Review. 2026; 3 (1):24-30.

DOI: 10.5005/jihr-11055-0029

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-06-2026

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2026; The Author(s).


Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into orthodontics, supporting tasks ranging from cephalometric landmark detection to treatment planning and remote monitoring. Evidence from recent literature shows consistent progress in diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency; however, its clinical impact remains dependent on validation, dataset quality, and regulatory clearance. Current applications demonstrate benefits in automated image analysis, multimodal data interpretation, and decision-support systems, yet real-world limitations persist. A major concern is restricted generalizability, as most models are trained on unicentric or homogeneous datasets, which raises risks of algorithmic bias and reduced reliability in complex or diverse clinical scenarios. Furthermore, ethical and legal factors, such as accountability, data privacy, and lack of standardized evaluation protocols, continue to limit large-scale adoption. Only a small proportion of AI tools have reached regulatory approval, underscoring the gap between experimental success and clinical maturity. This review synthesizes existing evidence, outlines key challenges, and highlights future directions, emphasizing the need for multicenter datasets, explainable AI systems, and structured regulatory frameworks to ensure safe and effective implementation in orthodontic practice.


PDF Share
PDF Share
  1. Naureen S. Limitations of artificial intelligence in orthodontics: literature review. JBUMDC 2025;15(1):53–59. DOI: 10.51985/JBUMDC2024452
  2. Nordblom NF, Büttner M, Schwendicke F. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: critical review. J Dent Res 2024;103(6):577–584. DOI: 10.1177/00220345241235606
  3. Liu J, Zhang C, Shan Z. Application of artificial intelligence in orthodontics: current state and future perspectives. Healthcare (Basel) 2023;11(20):1–15. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11202760
  4. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, et al. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
  5. Saito F,Kajii TS, Oka A, et al. Genome-wide association study for mandibular prognathism. Eur J Orthod 2017;152(3):382–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.021
  6. Gravely J, Johnson DJB. Angle's classification of malocclusion: reliability assessment. Br J Orthod 1974;1(3):79–86. DOI: 10.1179/bjo.1.3.79
  7. Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L. An Introduction to Orthodontics. Oxford University Press; 2019.
  8. Ali SA, Miethke HR. Invisalign, an innovative invisible orthodontic appliance to correct malocclusions: advantages and limitations. Dent Update 2012;39(4):254–260. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2012.39.4.254
  9. Alam MK, Kanwal B, Abutayyem H, et al. Complications arising due to orthodontic treatment – systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res 2023;13(6):4035. DOI: 10.3390/app13064035
  10. Alassiry AM. Orthodontic retainers: a contemporary overview. J Clin Diagn Res 2019;20(7):857–862. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2611
  11. Lopatiene K, Dumbravaite A. Risk factors of root resorption after orthodontics. Stomatologija 2008;10(3):89–95. PMID: 19001842.
  12. Wehrbein H,Feifel H, Diedrich P. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116(6):678–686. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70204-0
  13. Katberg RW, Westesson PL, Tallents RH, et al. Orthodontics and TMJ internal derangement. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;109(5):515–520. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70136-1
  14. Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson; 2016.
  15. Mitchell T. Machine Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
  16. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015;521(7553):436–444. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539
  17. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM 2020;63(11):139–144. DOI: 10.1145/3422622
  18. Kunz F, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Zeman F, et al. Fully automated cephalometric analysis using CNNs. Eur J Orthod 2020;81(1). DOI: 10.1007/s00056-019-00203-8
  19. Esteva A,Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med 2019;25(1):24–29. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z
  20. Wang X, Peng Y, Lu L, et al. Chest X-ray database benchmarks using weak supervision. IEEE CVPR; 2017.
  21. Liu Y, Gadepalli K, Norouzi M, et al. Detecting metastases on gigapixel pathology images. Nat Biomed Eng 2017. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1703.02442
  22. Liu J,Chen Y, Li S, et al. Machine learning in orthodontics: challenges and perspectives. Semin Orthod 2021;30. DOI: 10.17219/acem/138702
  23. Somashekhar S,Sepúlveda MJ, Puglielli S, et al. Watson for oncology treatment recommendations. J Clin Oncol 2018;29(2):418–423. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx781
  24. Köktürk B, Pamukçu H, Gözüaçık Ö, et al. ML algorithms for extraction decision in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 2024;27:13–24. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12811
  25. Nanda SB, Kalha AS, Jena AK, et al. ANN prediction of lip curvature changes. J Orthod Sci 2015;3(2). DOI: 10.5958/2393-9834.2015.00002.9
  26. Ryu J,Lee YS, Mo SP, et al. Deep learning for orthodontic photo classification. Korean J Orthod 2022;22(1):454. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02466-x
  27. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its orthodontic use. Angle Orthod 1931;1(2):45–66. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1931)001<0045:ANXTAI>2.0.CO;2
  28. Arık SÖ, Ibragimov B, Xing L. Automated quantitative cephalometry via CNNs. Med Image Anal 2017;4(1):014501. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.014501
  29. Durão APR, Morosolli A, Pittayapat P, et al. Landmark variability among orthodontists vs radiologists. Eur J Orthod 2015;45(4):213. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.213
  30. Kim J, Kim I, Kim YJ, et al. Accuracy of ceph landmark ID using CNNs. Orthod Craniofac Res 2021;24(Suppl 2):59–67. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12493
  31. Hwang HW,Moon JH, Kim MG, et al. Automated cephalometric analysis: latest deep learning method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021;91(3):329–335. DOI: 10.2319/021220-100.1
  32. Hwang HW,Park JH, Moon JH, et al. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks – part 2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;90(1):69–76. DOI: 10.2319/022019-129.1
  33. Lee SM,Kim HP, Jeon K, et al. 3D cephalometric annotation system. Med Phys 2019;64(5):055002. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab00c9
  34. Lee JH, Yu HJ, Kim MJ, et al. Cephalometric landmark detection with Bayesian CNN. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2020;20:1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01256-7
  35. Park JH, Hwang HW, Moon JH, et al. YOLOv3 vs SSD in landmark detection. Korean J Orthod 2019;89(6):903–909. DOI: 10.2319/022019-127.1
  36. Takeda S, Mine Y, Yoshimi Y, et al. PA cephalograms via CNN. J Dent Sci 2021;16(3):957–963. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.10.012
  37. Tsolakis IA, Tsolakis AI, Elshebiny T, et al. Automated tracing vs manual tracing comparison. Diagnostics 2022;11(22):6854. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226854
  38. Franchi L,Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular growth & cervical vertebra maturity. Am J Orthod 2000;118(3):335–340. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.107009
  39. Kucukkeles N, Acar A, Biren S, et al. Cervical vertebra vs hand-wrist maturity. Eur J Orthod 1999;24(1):47–52. PMID: 10709543.
  40. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. CVM method for timing. Semin Orthod 2005. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005
  41. Amasya H,Yildirim D, Aydogan T, et al. AI models for growth assessment. Eur J Orthod 2020;49(5):20190441. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190441
  42. Akay G, Akcayol MA, Özdem K, et al. CNN evaluation of cervical maturity. J World Fed Orthod 2023;39(4):629–638. DOI: 10.1007/s11282-023-00678-7
  43. Khazaei M, Mollabashi V, Khotanlou H, et al. Determination of growth spurts via CNN. Orthod Craniofac Res 2023;12(2):56–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.02.003
  44. Kang SH,Jeon K, Kang SH, et al. Multi-stage deep reinforcement learning for 3D cephalometry. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):17509. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97116-7
  45. Zhang J,Liu M, Wang L, et al. Context-guided FCNs for craniofacial bone segmentation. Med Image Anal 2020;60:101621. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101621
PDF Share
PDF Share

© 2026. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.