Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into orthodontics, supporting tasks ranging from cephalometric landmark detection to treatment planning and remote monitoring. Evidence from recent literature shows consistent progress in diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency; however, its clinical impact remains dependent on validation, dataset quality, and regulatory clearance. Current applications demonstrate benefits in automated image analysis, multimodal data interpretation, and decision-support systems, yet real-world limitations persist. A major concern is restricted generalizability, as most models are trained on unicentric or homogeneous datasets, which raises risks of algorithmic bias and reduced reliability in complex or diverse clinical scenarios. Furthermore, ethical and legal factors, such as accountability, data privacy, and lack of standardized evaluation protocols, continue to limit large-scale adoption. Only a small proportion of AI tools have reached regulatory approval, underscoring the gap between experimental success and clinical maturity. This review synthesizes existing evidence, outlines key challenges, and highlights future directions, emphasizing the need for multicenter datasets, explainable AI systems, and structured regulatory frameworks to ensure safe and effective implementation in orthodontic practice.
Naureen S. Limitations of artificial intelligence in orthodontics: literature review. JBUMDC 2025;15(1):53–59. DOI: 10.51985/JBUMDC2024452
Nordblom NF, Büttner M, Schwendicke F. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: critical review. J Dent Res 2024;103(6):577–584. DOI: 10.1177/00220345241235606
Liu J, Zhang C, Shan Z. Application of artificial intelligence in orthodontics: current state and future perspectives. Healthcare (Basel) 2023;11(20):1–15. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11202760
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, et al. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
Saito F,Kajii TS, Oka A, et al. Genome-wide association study for mandibular prognathism. Eur J Orthod 2017;152(3):382–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.021
Gravely J, Johnson DJB. Angle's classification of malocclusion: reliability assessment. Br J Orthod 1974;1(3):79–86. DOI: 10.1179/bjo.1.3.79
Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L. An Introduction to Orthodontics. Oxford University Press; 2019.
Ali SA, Miethke HR. Invisalign, an innovative invisible orthodontic appliance to correct malocclusions: advantages and limitations. Dent Update 2012;39(4):254–260. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2012.39.4.254
Alam MK, Kanwal B, Abutayyem H, et al. Complications arising due to orthodontic treatment – systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res 2023;13(6):4035. DOI: 10.3390/app13064035
Alassiry AM. Orthodontic retainers: a contemporary overview. J Clin Diagn Res 2019;20(7):857–862. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2611
Lopatiene K, Dumbravaite A. Risk factors of root resorption after orthodontics. Stomatologija 2008;10(3):89–95. PMID: 19001842.
Wehrbein H,Feifel H, Diedrich P. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116(6):678–686. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70204-0
Katberg RW, Westesson PL, Tallents RH, et al. Orthodontics and TMJ internal derangement. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;109(5):515–520. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70136-1
Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson; 2016.
Mitchell T. Machine Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015;521(7553):436–444. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539
Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM 2020;63(11):139–144. DOI: 10.1145/3422622
Kunz F, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Zeman F, et al. Fully automated cephalometric analysis using CNNs. Eur J Orthod 2020;81(1). DOI: 10.1007/s00056-019-00203-8
Esteva A,Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med 2019;25(1):24–29. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z
Wang X, Peng Y, Lu L, et al. Chest X-ray database benchmarks using weak supervision. IEEE CVPR; 2017.
Liu Y, Gadepalli K, Norouzi M, et al. Detecting metastases on gigapixel pathology images. Nat Biomed Eng 2017. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1703.02442
Liu J,Chen Y, Li S, et al. Machine learning in orthodontics: challenges and perspectives. Semin Orthod 2021;30. DOI: 10.17219/acem/138702
Somashekhar S,Sepúlveda MJ, Puglielli S, et al. Watson for oncology treatment recommendations. J Clin Oncol 2018;29(2):418–423. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx781
Köktürk B, Pamukçu H, Gözüaçık Ö, et al. ML algorithms for extraction decision in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 2024;27:13–24. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12811
Nanda SB, Kalha AS, Jena AK, et al. ANN prediction of lip curvature changes. J Orthod Sci 2015;3(2). DOI: 10.5958/2393-9834.2015.00002.9
Ryu J,Lee YS, Mo SP, et al. Deep learning for orthodontic photo classification. Korean J Orthod 2022;22(1):454. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02466-x
Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its orthodontic use. Angle Orthod 1931;1(2):45–66. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1931)001<0045:ANXTAI>2.0.CO;2
Arık SÖ, Ibragimov B, Xing L. Automated quantitative cephalometry via CNNs. Med Image Anal 2017;4(1):014501. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.014501
Durão APR, Morosolli A, Pittayapat P, et al. Landmark variability among orthodontists vs radiologists. Eur J Orthod 2015;45(4):213. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.213
Kim J, Kim I, Kim YJ, et al. Accuracy of ceph landmark ID using CNNs. Orthod Craniofac Res 2021;24(Suppl 2):59–67. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12493
Hwang HW,Moon JH, Kim MG, et al. Automated cephalometric analysis: latest deep learning method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021;91(3):329–335. DOI: 10.2319/021220-100.1
Hwang HW,Park JH, Moon JH, et al. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks – part 2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;90(1):69–76. DOI: 10.2319/022019-129.1
Lee SM,Kim HP, Jeon K, et al. 3D cephalometric annotation system. Med Phys 2019;64(5):055002. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab00c9
Lee JH, Yu HJ, Kim MJ, et al. Cephalometric landmark detection with Bayesian CNN. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2020;20:1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01256-7
Park JH, Hwang HW, Moon JH, et al. YOLOv3 vs SSD in landmark detection. Korean J Orthod 2019;89(6):903–909. DOI: 10.2319/022019-127.1
Takeda S, Mine Y, Yoshimi Y, et al. PA cephalograms via CNN. J Dent Sci 2021;16(3):957–963. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.10.012
Tsolakis IA, Tsolakis AI, Elshebiny T, et al. Automated tracing vs manual tracing comparison. Diagnostics 2022;11(22):6854. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226854
Franchi L,Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular growth & cervical vertebra maturity. Am J Orthod 2000;118(3):335–340. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.107009
Kucukkeles N, Acar A, Biren S, et al. Cervical vertebra vs hand-wrist maturity. Eur J Orthod 1999;24(1):47–52. PMID: 10709543.
Amasya H,Yildirim D, Aydogan T, et al. AI models for growth assessment. Eur J Orthod 2020;49(5):20190441. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190441
Akay G, Akcayol MA, Özdem K, et al. CNN evaluation of cervical maturity. J World Fed Orthod 2023;39(4):629–638. DOI: 10.1007/s11282-023-00678-7
Khazaei M, Mollabashi V, Khotanlou H, et al. Determination of growth spurts via CNN. Orthod Craniofac Res 2023;12(2):56–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.02.003
Kang SH,Jeon K, Kang SH, et al. Multi-stage deep reinforcement learning for 3D cephalometry. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):17509. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97116-7
Zhang J,Liu M, Wang L, et al. Context-guided FCNs for craniofacial bone segmentation. Med Image Anal 2020;60:101621. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101621