Effectiveness of Bowen therapy vs Manual Trigger point therapy for Non-Specific Neck pain in Home makers – A Comparative study

Author: Patel HA, Thakrar SJ, Chokshi C, Vedawala N.
Published Online: November 30, -0001
Abstract
References

Background: Neck pain is a common global issue, ranking as the sixth major cause of disability. Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) affects many, particularly housewives in India, due to factors like sedentary lifestyles and repetitive movements. NSNP prevalence varies widely, ranging from 16.7% to 75.1% globally. Housewives' tasks, like continuous leaning forward and lifting heavy items, contribute to their vulnerability. Understanding NSNP's prevalence and risks among housewives is crucial for effective intervention and improved quality of life.

Method: In a 4-week study, 30 middle-aged participants with acute nonspecific neck pain were selected based on specific criteria. They were divided into two groups: Group A received Bowen therapy, while Group B received manual trigger point therapy. Both groups underwent treatment sessions for 5 days a week over the 4-week period.

Result: The data was analyzed using SPSS Version 29. Statistical analysis revealed that both groups exhibited significant improvement, with Group A (Bowen therapy) showing greater improvement compared to Group B (Manual trigger point therapy).

Conclusion: The study compared Bowen therapy and manual trigger point therapy for non-specific neck pain in housewives. Bowen therapy showed greater improvement in pain relief and function compared to manual trigger point therapy.

Keywords: Non- specific neck pain, Housewives, Bowen therapy, Manual trigger point therapy, acute pain.
Download PDF Pages ( 17-21 ) Download Full Article (PDF)
←Previous Next →